|
中文摘要：
|
【目的】构建通过学术创新性而非学术影响力进行期刊评价的新指标——期刊颠覆性指数(Journal Disruption Index, JDI),并进行实证研究。
【方法】选择2016年Web of Science中Virology学科34种期刊中Article类型论文占比≥50%且可在开放引文数据库(the OpenCitations Index of Crossref open DOI-to-DOI citations, COCI)中获取引文关系的22种期刊作为研究对象，分别计算每种期刊的JDI,比较根据JDI和期刊5年累积影响因子(Cumulative Impact Factor for 5 Years, CIF5)、期刊PR6指数(Journal Index for PR6,JIPR6)、期刊论文被引频次平均百分位(Average Percentile in Subject Area, aPSA)排序的差异。分析创新性指标与不同影响力指标之间的相关度。
【结果】基于创新性指标和影响力指标的期刊排序结果存在较大差异：12种(54.5%)期刊JDI排名高于影响力指标排名；17种(77.0%)期刊两类指标排名差≥5。JDI与CIF5、JIPR6、aPSA都呈中度相关，相关度分别为0.486、0.471、-0.448。论文的绝对颠覆指数D_Z与论文累计被引频次(Accumulated Citations, AC)、论文6级百分位数排名(Percentile Ranking with 6 Classifications, PR6)、论文被引频次学科领域百分位(Percentile in Subject Area, PSA)亦呈中度相关，相关度分别为0.593、0.575、-0.593。
【结论】将JDI应用于科技期刊评价能更好地体现期刊载文的学术质量和原创性，较为客观地体现科技期刊的学术水平，有助于推动学术研究、科技期刊、学术评价体系良性发展。
|
|
英文摘要：
|
[Purposes] This paper aims to construct a new index for journal evaluation through academic innovation rather that academic influence Journal Disruption Index (JDI), and conduct empirical research.
[Methods] We selected 22 journals with≥50% Article, whose citation relationship could be obtained in the Open Citations Index of Crossref open DOI-to-DOI citations (COCI) , among 34 journals of Virology in Web of Science in 2016 as the research objects. JDI of each journal was calculated separately, and the differences between JDI and journal Cumulative impact Factor for 5 Years (CIF5), Journal Index for PR(JIPR6), and Average Percentile in Subject Area (aPSA) were analyzed.
[Findings] There are big differences in the ranking results of journals based on innovation index and influence index. There are 12 (54.5%) journals whose JDI ranking is higher that the ranking of impact indicators, and 17 (77.0% ) journals whose ranking difference between the two categories of indicators is ≥ 5. JDI is moderately correlated with CIF5, JIPR6, and aPSA, and the correlation degrees are 0.486, 0.471, and -0.448, respectively. Dz of the article is also moderately correlated with Accumulated Citations (AC), Percentile Ranking with 6 Classifications (PR6) and Percentile in Subject Area (PSA), with the correlation degrees of 0.593, 0.575, and -0.593, respectively.
[Conclusions] The application of JDI in the evaluation of scientific journals can better reflect the academic quality and originality of journals, objectively reflect the academic level of scientific journals, and help promote the sound development of academic research, scientific journals and academic evaluation system.
|